=There is considerable confusion in the consumer network access industry regarding the objective of congestion relief (traffic management) and that of market-segmentation and value-definition (usage management). In particular, many players often try to message that they are addressing congestion using volume limits, when in fact this is less effective.
I’ll refer to congestion occurring closest to the subscriber as the “weak link”. Not surprisingly, the most effective (in terms of relieving the congestion) and most fair (to subscribers) way to manage this congestion is by implementing corrective policies that are localized at the site of the congestion itself. In fact, this precise approach is what the FCC defines as “narrowly tailored”. Referring to Figure 1 below, if congestion occurs at the weak link (see A*) location and affects only users 1-5, then correcting that instance of congestion is ideal because Internet user traffic in other network locations such as locations B and C need not be touched.
Sandvine manages link congestion by examining, identifying, and prioritizing time-sensitive gaming, VoIP and streaming applications, over non time-sensitive applications such as emailing and browsing, or, alternatively, prioritising the users who are causing the least congestion vs. those who are causing the most in a short time interval. You and I don’t notice if we get an email 2 or 3 seconds later, but we will be upset if our voice calls are garbled and we can’t understand each other. Read the rest of this entry »

